2026 · Week 4
QB Fantasy Football Usage
Weekly QB opportunity, snap participation, target share, and red-zone involvement from completed games.
The table ranks players by position-appropriate opportunity: pass attempts plus rush attempts for quarterbacks, carries plus targets for running backs, and targets for wide receivers and tight ends.
| Player | Team | Opportunity | Targets | Carries | Target share | Snap share | Red zone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Burrow | CIN | 57 | 0 | 3 | — | 100.0% | 6 |
| Matthew Stafford | LA | 53 | 0 | 3 | — | 100.0% | 3 |
| Jared Goff | DET | 52 | 0 | 0 | — | 100.0% | 11 |
| Kirk Cousins | LV | 52 | 0 | 0 | — | 100.0% | 4 |
| Tyler Shough | NO | 50 | 0 | 2 | — | 100.0% | 7 |
| Dak Prescott | DAL | 47 | 0 | 2 | — | 100.0% | 4 |
| Bo Nix | DEN | 44 | 0 | 2 | — | 100.0% | 1 |
| Bryce Young | CAR | 42 | 0 | 3 | — | 100.0% | 4 |
| Drake Maye | NE | 42 | 0 | 8 | — | 100.0% | 5 |
| Aaron Rodgers | PIT | 40 | 0 | 0 | — | 100.0% | 9 |
| Kyler Murray | MIN | 40 | 0 | 6 | — | 100.0% | 6 |
| Jacoby Brissett | ARI | 39 | 0 | 4 | — | 100.0% | 8 |
| Brock Purdy | SF | 38 | 0 | 10 | — | 100.0% | 4 |
| Deshaun Watson | CLE | 38 | 0 | 7 | — | 100.0% | 4 |
| Josh Allen | BUF | 37 | 0 | 5 | — | 100.0% | 5 |
| Justin Herbert | LAC | 37 | 1 | 6 | — | 100.0% | 2 |
| Athan Kaliakmanis | WAS | 36 | 0 | 3 | — | 84.4% | 0 |
| Daniel Jones | IND | 36 | 0 | 4 | — | 100.0% | 3 |
| Cam Ward | TEN | 35 | 0 | 4 | — | 100.0% | 1 |
| Tyson Bagent | CHI | 35 | 0 | 4 | — | 100.0% | 8 |
How to use QB usage
Why can opportunity differ by position?
Fantasy roles are different. A quarterback’s primary opportunities are pass and rush attempts; a running back’s are carries and targets; receiver opportunity is best represented by targets.
Does a high usage rank guarantee fantasy points?
No. Usage describes recorded opportunity. Touchdowns, efficiency, scoring format, game script, and future matchup conditions can change fantasy production.